barneygale Posted January 17, 2014 Report Share Posted January 17, 2014 Syn's solution seems pretty watertight am i rite? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denevien Posted January 17, 2014 Report Share Posted January 17, 2014 Syn's solution seems pretty watertight am i rite? *sigh* This is why we don't take you places... 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwall_hp Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I missed Synergetrick's. It does sound better, judging by the discussion at least. This is more the techadmins' area, though. Obviously they would have to audit any plugins for that sort of performance issue before putting one in place. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderMan Posted February 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2014 Please Close thread Water Flow on S will be coming next map! - gsand ;D 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrloud15 Posted February 3, 2014 Report Share Posted February 3, 2014 Please Close thread Water Flow on S will be coming next map! - gsand ;D This might not be true. We don't want to say we will be removing safe buckets from S until we have tested the alternative solutions. Only after we have done that can we say that we will be removing safe buckets from S. As of right now, we can only say that we are actively looking at alternative solutions. Closing as you requested. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts