Sapphric, did you at any time, donate to nerd? It's obviously not a question i really need an answer to, but I ask because doing that and being in the position you're in now would certainly be some of the ingredients that would create situation that breeds entitlement. As in, "I've spent my time and my money on this and have assumed a leadership role, so it's going to be ran based around my ideals" (read: "one man's derp house is another man's palace"). Here's the issue with that: You don't have any entitlement to rule. you aren't the iron-fisted ruler of the PVE server. You were chosen, not hired.\ This is a community and you acting like you ARE the iron-fisted ruler of the PVE server is - plainly and simply - toxic. In Fact, ANY leader of a COMMUNITY (this isn't a COMPANY) acting in a stubborn and/or unresponsive manner is toxic. Toxic - in this case- to the direction some leaders are trying to steer Nerd. This community is going to die. It's been dying since John Adams had her unofficial "Head admins and friends" group and ran everyone off the road and locked everything down and bans were made on personal grounds (IE: really really dumb reasons because someone spoke badly of her or something along those lines if I remember correctly). You were either in with the program, or treated like garbage should you try to speak up. I'm really getting that vibe again here. maybe because A LOT of you were in power then.
I've been the one to start these conversations twice with other "Gaming communities": once back in 2008, and once a couple years ago with the Junction reboot. I was laughed at, torn down, lied to, ridiculed - similar to the way some of the leadership in this community would seem to be handling this thread. Both communities died less than a year later Partly due to leadership doing nothing but sitting on their thrones while their metaphorical kingdoms and castles burned to the ground and the inhabitants of both left with no actual effort to bring more in. In this case, it's leadership metaphorically locking down a half-burnt, partially abandoned tract of land, making it unappealing to long-timers such as ourselves.
The issue of the derp house of Mr. Stone was perpetuated as long as it was because it was also meant to shine light on a very important thing: the issues with Nerd leadership. you all threw a fit over an 81 block, over three month old, abandoned building. could we of not built in the area? yes, we never even actually intended to - we just kinda started doing so. Could you just of moved the build? YES, and you DIDN'T because you were trying to make a point. "THIS is how it is. TOO BAD." what? really? Okay, yeah, acting like that is certainly conducive to the community. I love this community as a whole, but frankly some of you make me almost physically ill. I know some of you are in work leadership roles IRL too, and the fact people who act like this are actually in charge of others and money is heavily involved makes me sick. this kind of leadership in a donation-driven community is not professionalism - it's powerlust.