Cyotie911
-
Posts
1,029 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Cyotie911
-
-
Okay, Unbanned.
Hope to see you on the servers.
Cyotie911
-
Hey Warchamp,
Give me some time to chat with the rest of the heads about this appeal. I'll keep you updated as we discuss this.
Cyotie911
-
What Does The Titanic And The Sixth Sense Have In Common?
Have you heard of our lord and savior waldo?
Who's your favorite action movie hero?
Whats the worst movie you have ever seen?
Do you like fish sticks?
1. They were both shifty movies?
2. I've heard of him but can't seem to find him.
3. Actor: either Arnold Schwarzenegger or chuck norris... character: Tyler Durden
4. The Talented Mr. Ripley (only movie I've ever actually gotten up in the middle of the movie and walked out on)
5. No, I am however fond of Cheesy Poofs!
-
Should I tell her how I feel?
I would say yes... unless it happens to be a Thursday then I'd say no. Unless that day is in the 3rd week of the month then definitely yes. Unless it happens to be an odd numbered year then absolutely no. But then again if your name starts with an "A" then YES.
So I'd say definitely MAYBE!!
-
1
-
-
Forgot about this thread so thought I'd necromancer my thread a little bit.. just in case anyone actually wanted to post in it. :p
-
Y u closed da thred. We weres making illegitimate progresses in da last threds. Pleases keeps this thred on topix.
-
6
-
-
Okay Livoid, There was a report of you harassing a player on our server. I banned you just upon a glance of the logs for the types of comments you were making. These types of comments are disturbing in and of themselves. After further review of the logs, it looks as though the player was, at first, taking them as a joke but then started to get irratated by them after a while. The player was getting annoyed but could have been taken by you as trollish banter in joking form. They did ask you to please stop which you evidently did a short while later, which is why I am going to retract this ban and just give you a warning that your behavior on the server is borderline to excessive trollish. You need to understand that your actions, even if they are meant in a joking manner, can end up having an unintended result. If you are doing or saying something that could get you banned, then you have to consider yourself accountable if the player you are talking to decides to all of a sudden report you. Please think about this when your behavior turns trollish in the future.
Cyotie911
-
Just letting you know that I am gathering logs and I'll get back with you shortly.
-
Thinking it might be better to just create new accounts. That way the old account names will be reserved instead of players temptations to create accounts with the old staff names.
-
1
-
-
Jcahcne sounds like a cool guy... now Jchance on the other hand. That guys a prick.
-
3
-
-
No seriously, there's no need for anyone to be afraid of me! I'm not really the devil incarnate that everyone says I am!
-
In response to Jchances ever growing popular thread.
-
Sorry for the huge delay. I don't personally have an issue with the name you have chosen. It doesn't portray your choices in the most flattering light, however, I personally don't have an issue with this username. Give me a day to discuss your unbanning with the rest of the heads. Know that, if you use the name to troll on our server, (i.e. state that you are storm, or that you are a part of the griefing group) you can probably expect to be banned.
Thank and I'll get back to you shortly.
-
I will agree that, even though I have never saw instances of staff talking openly in mumble about bans or harassing people with mumble channel names and such, that I would agree that this behavior is absolutely not behavior that I want coming from staff members and urge you to bring this to the attention of an administrator if it happens in the future.
As far as the part about consistency in how rule infractions are handled, this is the way it is all over the world with how public athority figures handle rule breakers. Everyone has a "use your best judgement" policy when it comes down to how certain rules are broken. For example... A cop sees you speeding. You are doing 7 miles an hour over the speed limit on the highway. He doesn't pull you over. 2 miles later, going the same 7 miles over the speed limit, you pass by another cop who does pull you over and gives you a verbal warning. You take back off again and pass by another cop while speeding who doesn't pull you over followed by a forth cop who actually gives you a ticket. These cops are totally independent of each others actions but you just got lucky and didn't hit the cop that was writing tickets until the forth cop. You could have, just as well, hit the ticket writing cop on the first stop. The ticket would have been justified at every stop since you were speeding, but it's up to the cop to if they want to write a ticket or not.
Same thing with judges, if you show up to Court for an offence, the judge can set a wide variety of punishments, most offenses come with a minimum sentence (that is normally used in most cases) but there is also a maximum that could be inforced. This still is left up to the judges discression.
Even in someone's job athority figures use different ways of thinking... you could have 3 different shift manager that might look at the same offense differently. One could fire you, one could give you a written warning, one could just verbally warn you.
Now there are some more serious offenses that will earn you a ban as soon as they happen, like xraying. There's not going to be a warning in this case and it pretty much carries a 1 month ban (the exception is if this isn't your first xray ban)
Other than those types of things, we value our staff's option to do what they feel is right when regarding people who break the rules. They think about whether it was an accident, what is deliberate but minor, was it done out of anger or retaliation, or if it was major and just done with rule breaking as the sole intention.
This is what makes us unique and I support this was of rule inforcement.
P.S. I wrote this on my phone so please excuse if something autocorrected poorly.
-
1
-
-
How would you draw the line between the two? It's a fuzzy line where the admins lose out heavily if they get it wrong.
If we get a complaint from a player whose name has been mimicked by another player it's obviously not a joke to them and therefore will be considered harassment
-
If a nick was changed with the intention of looking similar to another players name WITHOUT the players consent, this will be considered an attempt to troll and will be considered harassment. This will more or less remain at the discretion of the player who's name it mimics. All name changes from players to a name similar to a staff member will be considered impersonation of a staff member REGARDLESS of a player trying to use it to trick other members or not. The name change itself was changed with the intention of harassing, and mimicing, and that will not be tolerated.
Name changes themselves will warrant a ban on that particular account until such time when that account name can be changed to something else. Accounts that are further used to troll with actual in game impersonation of a staff member will warrant a ban that will extend to other accounts that a player uses (like a normal ban entails).
-
3
-
-
Duplicate appeal.
-
Unbanned
-
Jauris, if you would like to play this game here you go... Technically JohnAdams was never removed from staff, she will always be a part of our staff. Your attitude and trolling nature have far exceeded any line that could ever have been drawn. You crossed that line long ago and now you will have to deal with the consequences of your actions. Your ban length is set at 6 months. Reappeal then and if at that time you would like to continue to be a part of this community, you should reevaluate how you treat other people because your current attitude will not be welcome in this community any longer.
-
Your ban length has now been extended by 1 month. Reappeal in 1 month to deal with your original ban.
-
This ban is from a while ago and I'm not going to take the time to sort through pictures from that far back. In the event that your account was compromised, please go change your password and go ahead and reread the rules at http://nerd.nu/rules and reply back here stating that you understand them.
-
Okay, go reread the rules at http://nerd.nu/rules and reply back here stating that you understand and will abide by them from now on.
-
Hey, wanted to let you know I will reply to this tomorrow when I have more time.
Cyotie911
-
You were banned for griefing, not stealing (as shown in your ban reason below)
Please allow up to 48 hours for your banning moderator, GabeRios17, to respond.
Ban for big_boy_92 on c.nerd.nu for Griefing on P. nerd.nu/appeal by GabeRios17 on 2015-01-21T06:57:46.602 (no more bans, no notes)
The Cyotie911 ama
in The Archives
Posted
2. It's kinda like a mood ring. It will change colors with how many people in the community like you.