Jump to content

CROCKODUCK

Members
  • Posts

    613
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CROCKODUCK

  1. My god is it good to see you again Barli and hope all is well as I'm sure everyone does. To add to this, I agree that we should change to the new system of adding time and no permabans, but then the severity is what I disagree with. They need to understand that you can't just skip around your ban date so on top of the orignal ban date for the first account, tack on a month for each alt and then give each alt an unban date of 2 months on top of that to push the seriousness of it. Sorry if this has been said, its a bit late.
  2. A solid non BS server so to speak that will not disappear with the EULA.
  3. It's two days, you can wait. Closing.
  4. First off it's called a mute. Not a gag. This is not technically the section for this, but I'll allow it. Second please be patient for a head admin to view and respond to this, Link to the players McBouncer profile: http://mcbouncer.com/user/terminal1nsanity/notesFor
  5. A solid argument? I'm not going to derail this thread to point out that you've basically just pointed out the new features of survival and not any suggestions of how to make it work for anyone. Personal restraint is a good trait to pickup, as bias in an argument is like fighting a wall. All we need to remember is that the majority is what matters. The core S players who come to one of the last "vanilla" servers, and not to be griefed and imprisoned. That was my point.
  6. Is actually a girl, she's a wild one. Being serious I agree we need a clean up of this.
  7. Stats? Numbers? Proof it's old players returning? Last I checked you had been out of the survival community for a while. I also hope that the servers continue to change, but without altering general gameplay as much. I have been thinking and trying to come up with alternative suggestions for the survival thread.
  8. I'm part of the clan yes, but I build on my own. I know that's mind blowing but it can happen. My TL; DR was simply don't forget all the countless old players we've driven away by this civcraft change.
  9. For starters, the nerd.nu website even says "vanilla based survival" yet, the only thing that is still vanilla are the textures. We are succeeding at being something we are not. Losing our identity if you will. It's nice that some of you hardcore S players have massive clans, but for the other 45% of the server population who don't trust others or find it fun to team up, where does that leave us? Are we shit out of luck so to speak? The identity of S has been lost this rev by a massive margin and just because some massive clans and random civcraft players support the numbers, does not conclude it's for the better. We should be trying to make everyone happy, not half the population or less, but that also seems to be lost with our identity...
  10. This is why this rev will be over before it begins. I respect the sadmins to death but what a waste of time setting all of this up for only a select group of players who are monopolizing the server because we let them. Very disappointed with how all of this has turned out.
  11. Evening lads and lasses, just a small heads up that I am off for some R&R out east for about a week to two weeks so please take care of any appeals for myself if you could so kindly, and avoid blowing stuff up. Alright happy trails o/ Special goodbye for Denevien:
  12. Hello _al_capone_, You were banned for using homophobia in a slang manner after being told it was not allowed, and the relevant chat logs are below: Player names are removed for discretion You were just trying to troll and cause drama and we both know this. Read the rules and reply here stating the rule you broke to be unbanned.
  13. I get the behind the scenes idea, but again that seems to be excuses for why none of our ingame players who are maybe new to the servers within 5 months have NO idea we even have head admins. We need to establish some kind of median that please everyone. Back in the day, shouldn't be the "golden age" where we could consult our head admins in game and not have to sift through IRC and wait long periods of time. That is the kind of direct leadership that we require.
  14. This is exactly, spot on what we need. Perhaps we can get a feel for how head admins feel about their role now? We truly do need stronger leadership and in the coming weeks I hope to see a significant change that we can all agree will benefit us in the end.
  15. This is what we need. Back in 2011-2012 all heads were very active on the servers, but since at least last year we have formed this norm that the head admins are nothing but myths who appear very very occasionally. I understand real life. Trust me on that, but then they have to ask themself if they are busy or burnt out of the game. That is really the defining difference and yes we do need active head admins in game and out of game.
  16. Thank you and unbanned, and to answer your question, you do not run for a staff position. The staff have a discussion of who would be good as a moderator and then ask those players if they are interested in being a moderator, and No, being banned does not automatically disqualify you.
  17. Hello attackofthebrick, Thanks for admitting to griefing, unfortunately I do not have access to my screenshots as of this moment, and the ban period I would have set is far since expired, so to be unbanned please read the rules and reply here stating the rules you broke!
  18. Which of the 2 recipes for 43:8 did you choose might I ask?
  19. It involves policy changes and can't just be thrown into a thread about adding decorative blocks...
×
×
  • Create New...