EeHee2000

Which thread? I can't find any on this particular topic

<3 Welcome back amigo

bump for fucks sake

My point is that normal ban judging is assisted by criteria and more importantly the rules themselves to fairly deem whether the 'offender' has actually done anything wrong, whereas with the new terms a Head could simply go 'I dislike that, have a weeklong ban' without a proper way of determining whether the player in question is innocent.

bump pls, has nearly been 48 hours side note: please dont give me a shitty response because it hasn't been 48 hours

As did the Allies my friend

At least it wasn't 2 years, I suppose. Just not sure how exactly that note is relevant, I can hardly remember what even happened to cause that.

I'm pretty sure BCB is being sarcastic. Outlawing swearing would drive a lot of people away and earn a lot of people bans, please don't be stupid enough to put that into motion. ;_;

Well, go ahead and set me a sentence, please don't give me something absurd. But, as I asked, can I also get that pesky little note removed?

I suppose I'll agree with d3north and BMX that there are very easily manipulated new terms. The problem with the whole "escalating attacks" part is that different people obviously interpret things differently, - it means that if a single Head Admin deems something to be offensive, the offender instantly deserves a ban - which is far too exploitable. It comes down entirely to the personal opinion of a single person, which is really not the cleanest way of doing things. That being said I believe a reconsideration or rewording of the policy/rule in question is in order, because whilst I don't assume it will be abused, the potential is definitely there for the using.

please unban me amigo going to assume this gem right here was the reason I was banned: http://prntscr.com/5dpl6l however checking mcbouncer I was banned for "innapropriate conduct" as shown here: http://mcbouncer.com/u/07859f9128494d529e638bb4cdae9a36/bansFor could you please update the rules to reflect that "innapropriate conduct" is against the rules/policies of the server? love and kisses from eehee EDIT: Whilst we're at it can I get this little guy removed? http://mcbouncer.com/u/07859f9128494d529e638bb4cdae9a36/notesFor

Payday 1 is somewhat dated but still hella fun with friends, but at this point in time Payday 2 is by far a better purchase. Updates, vibrant community and whatever else whereas Payday 1 is rather dead - not only that but Payday 1 requires an utter fuckton of time if you want to unlock the simplest items/attachments.

Can you please stop triggering me?

Steam: Eehee333 Origin: Eehee333 LoL: Eehee333

It's because in the past you've never actually done anything of note with the official Steam group. Not a single gaming tournament or even just a casual gaming event has been held yet we've offered to step in and help which has been met with little response until now.

Didn't mean to imply that you were but just as a general term is all. \o/

I'd be down for some TF2, yeah. \o/

We do love you, Timmy, you just don't let yourself believe it.

Huh. Well, yesterday when I tried to get on I just used a spoof username, something like "eeeeeeeeeeeeheeeee" and was apparently banned on that, whereas now for some reason I'm able to get on with a different username. It's all good though, I'm basically unbanned. \o/

http://prntscr.com/5cdnaa Not really sure what I did, I was being immature but I didn't break any rules to my knowledge. If I did something wrong I'll accept my sentence and that'll be that but I legitimately have no clue what I did. Anyway, let's get this over with.

LISTEN THE FUCK UP YOU PRIVELIGED LITTLE SHIT I JUST SPILT MY FUCKING WATER ON MY NICE WOODEN FLOOR

USE THE FUCKING FORUM FORMATTING YOU FUCKING TWAT

JOIN THE EFFORT TODAY LADS EEHEE NEEDS YOU

I WANT MORE VANILLA COKE BUT AS MENTIONED EARLIER I'VE RUN OUT FUCK