EeHee2000

See, I'm not looking for an opinion on it, I'm looking to get my note removed. I don't think "no" is how a note appeal should be handled, especially considering that I've not repeated the heinous offence that I did to earn the note in the first place on any sort of basis. Telling me to stop making appeals is a bit silly when I asked you not to post on the thread in the first place, jchance - that same request from me stands here to both yourself and to Mrloud15. Let's not overdramatise a note from half a year ago and act like sensible humans for a bit. Cheers.

http://prntscr.com/63oj1f Can I get this half-year-old note removed? I'd also appreciate someone other than Mrloud15 to handle this, thanks.

god please no more

Perhaps an alternative to the 'underwater arena' Dizney had the idea for would be a standard arena, but with small amounts of lava around the place - Fire Resistance would be applied to stop people from burning and whatnot, of course.

AYYYYY

Not sure why you're acting all shitty, I'm not trying to stir anything up in this thread. For the record; I don't give a single fuck about your opinion on my signature - I'd request that you go fuck yourself if you think I'm at any obligation to change it. It's a tiny little piece of text and acting all triggered by it isn't what I'd call 'helpful'. I'm pretty amused if you think this is going to get anything accomplished - telling people to go away isn't going to make them go away, it's going to make them angry at you and they'll most likely retaliate. Don't stir the pot with your accusations of other people stirring the pot, you hypocrite.

I agree with Sir_Walmsley - beating around the bush is something nerd does far too much in hindsight. Whilst I'm not actually one of the people that 'left' in a fit of rage, I do believe that insulting people one final time is something that ought to be allowed to the point where it becomes harassment or plainly breaks a rule. I know a lot of us here hold some pretty deep-set grudges against certain people, and in all fairness expressing those grudges could help nerd in some way.

Ayy, I'll be attending this for sure - great move, amigo.

Ah, so because you dislike/disagree with a person, their way of doing things in relation to a topic that you've done very little to contribute to is instantly incorrect/devoid of relevance regardless of whether you've seen any end result? Truly, you have enlightened me with the error of d3north's ways. Feel free to stop adding in little shitcakes of drama and whatnot, all you've done in this thread is jab a bit at people that you disagree with. Perhaps focusing on the topic at hand in an attempt to get something going would be a smart move, no?

That's perfectly fair, as long as the topic is given a solid amount of thought and discussion is had.

Should pyr0's suggestion above be acted upon (remove d3's Steam group) it would be a fair fallback to then add d3north to the 'official' Steam group as a Moderator, or perhaps another level of staff within that Steam group. Not to sound aggressive or anything, but claiming you're willing to have players that aren't staff moderate the Steam group is completely pointless if you won't give the slightest level of authority to the player that actually kicked this entire Steam thing off.

No, d3north is doing something I'd like to call "quality assurance". He isn't about to hand over the new group to the admins if he has a reason to believe it'll flop like the other official group - which, to clarify; it did. (You can argue with me about that, if you want, I'm happy to discuss it.) Being informed on exactly what is happening with the Steam group(s) is something that the players need in order to know whether said Steam group(s) are just going to fall flat on their face - we have more reason to believe that nothing will happen with the new groups, because in all honesty nothing in particular with the other Steam groups. "Eehee we've had a few TTT events that've stretched on for quite a while, and we've even added a whole bunch of new staff." Adding new staff doesn't get much done - we've seen this happen with the SAdmin crisis of Survival and it's happening to a lesser degree with the 'official' Steam group. I deeply appreciate that there was a poll asking about what games we should play, and I believe there are still a couple of ongoing threads discussing that - but that doesn't give us any solid reason to believe something will be put into action with the group d3north created. We've waited a pretty damn long time to see something get done, and whilst we know something is getting done, I personally disagree with the idea that d3north should hand over the new group as soon as he's asked. Besides, there's no drama needed for this particular topic anyway. Most of the people on the current official Steam group probably don't care to migrate to a new group - realistically URL's on our other services leading to the current 'official' Steam group coupled with perhaps a short explanation of the innacurate name in the description could fix this entire debacle we're having.

Bit rude to ask someone to immediately step away from something they started, friend.

As TornadoHorse pointed out above, revisions only seem to start when there's a bit of a struggle from the players to actually hear what's going on with Survival - sticking to a smoother timeframe for revisions is something you really need to do if you want the community to approve of Survival a lot more. No, he's saying that the support given by the community to the admins kind-of overshadows their own efforts - really, the players seem to have put in a lot more effort than the admins have, whether that's from a 'biased' standpoint or not.

I-it's a discussion about revision 28, please don't bring hot-tubs into this. or penguins

As Magnyus and Tebok are saying for the most part, literally all we need to do is remove the word 'reddit' from all our services and redefine what we actually are. It really isn't such a big deal.

ayylmao Appealing because this account is still banned for being an alt of a banned account, however EeHee2000 is now unbanned. Cheers.

ayylmao Appealing because this account is still banned for being an alt of a banned account, however EeHee2000 is now unbanned. Cheers.

BUMP up in this big boii

In expectation of not getting a straight answer to my question, I'll go ahead and say that I've read and understand the rules. *BUMP.

Oh, I've always had a poor attitude now? If people are afraid of discussing matters with me it's likely because they either disagree with literally everything I say or they've never actually bothered to speak with me in the first place. No need for apology either, we got some really top notch discussion going on in here, with "bump" being mentioned here and there. Hey, if you want to respond with a tone similar to mine, please consider first looking into the reasons I actually made that post.

In what way does breaking the forum rules show that I don't intend to follow the rules ingame? Going by your own logic, wouldn't being banned on the forums also show that I don't intend to follow the rules on Mumble? Why wasn't I banned on there?

I don't think there needs to be a big debate over this. The reason shit takes so long to get anywhere in this broken-down place is because someone always has something to fucking complain about, there's always some possibility of something going wrong, and so on. We're asking for the filesize limitations to be larger on a voice communication service. Please. I started this thread nearly 3 fucking weeks ago and we're nowhere near an answer - why?

If you consider a single swearword in an overall more coherent edit 'rude', I'm confused. Anyway, I still don't understand keeping me banned ingame for my forum activities. I should've had my ban on the forums, which was given, but there was absolutely no reason to extend my ingame ban. Let's say I give you the leisure of understanding banning my forum accounts and being punished for evading - but my evading was on the FORUMS.