-
Posts
156 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Diznatch52
-
This seems very fair.
-
I've dropped off again, but I spent about a month pretty active on P and never heard of him.
-
Why are mods and admins voting here? You have your own thread, and there's no point in double voting just to skew the results to look more like the mod/admin voting thread.
-
There's a working version of /seen on the internet. Having it disallowed in game seems kinda silly at this point.
-
Survival Enderpearl Cooldown: Part V - The Result
Diznatch52 replied to Mrloud15's topic in Minecraft General
You fool, it was added. -
Survival Enderpearl Cooldown: Part V - The Result
Diznatch52 replied to Mrloud15's topic in Minecraft General
What jll said. -
Survival Enderpearl Cooldown: Part V - The Result
Diznatch52 replied to Mrloud15's topic in Minecraft General
Out of curiosity, why, then, was an enderpearl cooldown set up? Was it just to make it so you couldn't just prison pearl people over and over? -
BUMP. Have any discussions been happening at a higher level as a result of this thread?
-
BUMP. Any news on this?
-
Forum rule request: use of up/downvotes
Diznatch52 replied to barneygale's topic in Minecraft General
BUMP. This seems to have run its course. Can a Hadmin comment on the results of this Poll? -
Renewing our relationship with r/minecraft
Diznatch52 replied to barneygale's topic in Minecraft General
But we didn't, which is kind of my point. -
It's when you hang out at someone's base and kill them whenever they try to return.
-
Forum rule request: use of up/downvotes
Diznatch52 replied to barneygale's topic in Minecraft General
Wow. That exploded. I was one of the people calling for the vote, so I accept its results either way. I just said it reminded me of that quote because it was 51:49. Apologies if I didn't clarify that better. #wasajoke. Might not want to take everything so personally. -
I'm kinda sad that this stopped being a thing shortly after it began being a thing.
-
While I agree with four that barney certainly has the right to post what he did as it is relevant to the thread at hand, I must say that I disagree with his opinion about this specific case. Firstly, he corrected the player on calling the gags simply because we officially refer to them as mutes. I don't really see anything wrong about that. Secondly, I do believe that as a moderator of the forum, it is his prerogative to decide whether something was posted in the wrong place. Thirdly, while asking for patience initially isn't always what is done, I believe it is justified when asking for a headadmin or when one is required, as they tend to take longer in replying than the usual banning moderator. Fourthly, while linking to the mcbouncer profile is admittedly a little unusual, it's not that far a leap from what us usually done. That being just copy-pasting the information from the mcbouncer profile.
-
Renewing our relationship with r/minecraft
Diznatch52 replied to barneygale's topic in Minecraft General
While I'm all for this server, I don't really see why /r/minecraft should stick its neck out for us. They are the subreddit for general minecraft, and to be honest I don't really see why they should specifically recommend us. Sure we still call ourselves the "official reddit minecraft servers," but really how true is that anymore? -
Forum rule request: use of up/downvotes
Diznatch52 replied to barneygale's topic in Minecraft General
Sounds like something a member of the 49% might say. -
Willravel, do you not see that as banning the account rather than the person, though? Isn't the main goal of this to avoid exactly that situation? If someone uses an alt to circumvent a ban, I don't see why that should merit a punishment that could be way beyond the scope of the original ban. Sure, we can take into account cases pf people who repeatedly circumvent, but we already take into account past offenses when determining the appropriate punishment.
-
Announcing that you're going to have downvotes coming your way doesn't make your post any less unproductive.
-
So you though to dirty it more?
-
I appreciate that x-raying is a difficult thing to handle, but I'm not sure what you have added to this discussion. This isn't a discussion about how we need to ban more x-rayers. It's a discussion of how to handle teams of people when some but not all are x-raying. Did you read at all past Willravel's post before responding?
-
never mind.
-
Right, I don't mean a full rollback like what would happen to the xrayer, just a rollback of the damage done to that base. They shouldn't be penalized, but neither should the owners of the base.
-
I don't think this what he meant. If I'm wrong, please correct me. I'm understand this to be the case of a team of people who get into a base through the use of xray. The thing is that only one person on the team is actually xraying and the others just follow him in. Should they all be rolled back? Just the xrayer? Etc. In my opinion, they should all be rolled back, since the gains were made through the use of hacking, regardless of who was actually xraying.