twilexis

redwall and I were discussing this the other day and he was throwing around the idea of players being able to access EasySigns SignText only on signs you've placed. There was some blah blah tech admin talk about using lb (I think) logs to show you've placed it before being able to edit. That also gets around the grief factor, because a griefer would have to break and replace the sign someone else placed to edit it, so there'd be a lb log of the sign being broken. EDIT: Wrong plugin, derp

Tim is now my most favourite C player.

Also, for those who don't know, the flickering in the lobbies are caused by the portals being too close together. Zburd and I tested that a bit with the current lobby.

Is an E portal really nessissary? I don't know what you have planned for the future (and I hope it will be something spectacular) but for the last year and a half we haven't used it besides 2 days. Can't we cull the E portal and the admins can add one floating somewhere when there's an event on?

This thread is for your jchance fanfiction. Standard story tagging rules apply. Story Name: Warnings: Length: Also, join the Official clan chat on PvE, #jchancespants

I did a quick teaser video from tonight :D https://youtu.be/NZh4Pcb5_Lc?t=10s

Why does SportsBall even exist? I saw Socarch (I think) add it earlier and assumed it was a temp channel.

Requesting a general clean up of the gaming sub-channels. -Battlefield 4 -Europa Universalis -League of Legends From what I've personally witnessed, no one uses these channels for their intended purposes. They can always be added back in the future. Requesting a TF2 channel to be added - we play this on a regular basis. Thankie <3

The only problem I see with this is that the portal doesn't close instantly when the lobby closes.

How many views can a SwitchViewz switch if a SwitchViewz can switch views?

What do you think you will bring to the admin team? Also Holy fuck now I'm hungry ;_;

I have the conga taunt. I volunteer as tribute :D

How much thrax could a Mumber thrax if a Mumber could mumber thrax?

In rev 12 and 13 we had doppelganger trade signs, where you could trade in padmin kills for certain items. Padmins, could we please bring these back, for resources such as sponge? I know this was created to introduce 1.7 items that weren't in 1.6, but sponge is a highly sought after commodity, especially in a world that has a large chunk of water. I can't think of any other blocks that could be included in these trade signs, but maybe there are other items that people want that are very rare. EDIT: Horse armour is another thing I'd like to see.

Pssst... Please vote too, although comments are welcome :D I'm an idiot for not clicking 'Show Results'. Disregard lol

Hi guys! Quick poll to find out what your preferences are with lobbies. Zburdsal and I have been working on a couple and are information gathering to see what the community prefers. Keep in mind, lobbies can be player submitted. If you would like to submit a lobby design just talk to a member of the admin team for further information.

Can we do this for cat types too?

TL;DR - Make iron grinders and use iron from golem drops to sell in chest shops and for trades.

You speak as if I don't know this :) The bottom pods are complete and fully functional. Still only the pods themselves and the kill room are protected in seperate regions. Kind of silly.

One would also think this applied to terraforming for iron grinders. Seneca's iron grinder area has been cleared, terraformed and fenced off, but a region protection for the area has been denied and people are starting to build in the area, their doors screwing with the villager mechanics for the iron grinder.

"What do you think about this purple thing, wondr? Is this part of your build?"

A way to get around that is to remove villagers entirely and add iron to the shop.

This is an example of why the ban appeal system should stay as it is. I remember what you're talking about, and if the bans weren't made public then it wouldn't have come to light and could have been swept under the rug.

It's not. It's transparency for the banning moderator/admin, so they're not accused of banning unjustly. The current ban appeal system is in place so the person who broke the rules have to acknowledge what rule they broke, proving they have read the rules and understand them. If you follow the rules you won't be seen in the ban appeal section. It's quite simple.

I have to agree with UNP here. You're over-complicating the issue. 'Don't be homophobic'. The end.