Jump to content

EeHee2000

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    788

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by EeHee2000

  3. This is a huge issue that needs to be fixed

    in Minecraft General

    Posted · Edited by EeHee2000

    I love how my shittery of 2012 has transitioned from a net negative to a net positive for the admins. Need a convenient excuse for never making anyone with a modicum of involvement with the community an admin? Facing a dilemma where you have personal beef with the painfully obvious candidates for admin? Just elect someone you chat with every day in private IRC rooms instead! Why? Because 2 years ago someone we trusted fucked us over, so now we can never trust anyone but our mates again. If MCPublic was a reddit user, they'd be subscribed to r/theredpill.

     

    It's ridiculous to read people like totemo once again talk about "naysayers". We had trolls in my day too, you know, but there weren't enough to downvote the announcement of a new admin to 0 points. Are they rabble-rousing, or are you just wrong? Want to get rid of the naysayers in one easy step? Shut down the survival server. Stop playing this fucking game where you perennially give survival players hope, then do nothing for weeks, then do something shitty and unjustifyable. Some of the people in this thread still give a shit about survival, please fucking stop treating them with as much distain as I treated the admins 2 years ago.

     

    > You're often asking for a big change, seemingly based entirely on your idea of what you want the S server to be. Someone without any baggage or attachment to the S you call failing would do that job perfectly.

     

    How stupid do you have to be to type these words and consider it worthwhile to press the "Post" button? The mind boggles.

    Puts my thoughts into words, well said. 

    Admins, stop whacking off in the corner and fucking do something with Survival. The routine of adding new admins that barely know Survival is clearly not working and it's hilarious that you still haven't noticed that. 

    Inb4 post removed. 

  7. I dribble, AMA.

    in The Archives

    Posted · Edited by EeHee2000

    This might not be a good example (or even topic) but I'd like to you read this. https://www.reddit.com/r/aspergers/comments/2c51dq/im_sick_of_autism_being_used_as_a_insult_on/ Be serious for this. I'll ask a non-serious set later, keep it in for then.

    I've got a brother with autism, I know about it as much as you do if not more - frankly, people who can't bear autism jokes are expecting too much love from the Internet. 

  10. EeHee2000 [Mrloud15]

    in Closed Ban Appeals

    Posted

    To add to my statement, looking through the logs MasterAzuk was logged on for exactly 8 seconds.
    I don't think 8 seconds of 'playtime' could be considered as evading a ban. 
    In my opinion, logging onto a server and evading a ban are two different things, especially in this case. 

  11. EeHee2000 [Mrloud15]

    in Closed Ban Appeals

    Posted · Edited by EeHee2000

    Aighty, I've got to disagree with your decision here. 
    If you look back through the logs, I jumped on the servers with my alt account for under 10 seconds, said "ayylmao", noticed I was on my alt and immediately logged out. I wasn't intentionally evading and if I was, how the utter fuck could I have gotten any enjoyment out of loading into the world and saying "ayylmao"? Are you certain I've actually done something that should extend my ban by 2 weeks? Give it some thought. If you're seriously believing that I've actually done something wrong with my alternate account, you're a bit on the twatty side.
    Also, big thanks for doxxing my alternate account, I really appreciate it. 

  19. Opening feedback from the head admin log

    in Minecraft General

    Posted

    This is how most bans are dealt with; mod or admin discretion. I'm not going to confide in someone else whenever I want to make a ban, so why should this be any different? If anything, these types of bans are put into greater consideration than other bans already.

    My point is that normal ban judging is assisted by criteria and more importantly the rules themselves to fairly deem whether the 'offender' has actually done anything wrong, whereas with the new terms a Head could simply go 'I dislike that, have a weeklong ban' without a proper way of determining whether the player in question is innocent. 

    • Upvote 2

  25. Opening feedback from the head admin log

    in Minecraft General

    Posted · Edited by EeHee2000

    I suppose I'll agree with d3north and BMX that there are very easily manipulated new terms. 
    The problem with the whole "escalating attacks" part is that different people obviously interpret things differently, - it means that if a single Head Admin deems something to be offensive, the offender instantly deserves a ban - which is far too exploitable. 
    It comes down entirely to the personal opinion of a single person, which is really not the cleanest way of doing things. 
    That being said I believe a reconsideration or rewording of the policy/rule in question is in order, because whilst I don't assume it will be abused, the potential is definitely there for the using. 

    • Upvote 5
×
×
  • Create New...