twilexis Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) There are a few major changes to survival: https://nerd.nu/forums/topic/3033-changes-to-survival/ More info will be posted soon. Stepping down. That's a new way of describing what happened. Why don't you own your share of the blame? Edited February 4, 2015 by twilexis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unce Posted February 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) Stepping down. That's a new way of describing what happened. Why don't you own your share of the blame? I thought you quit after you told us all to die in a fire? Please don't bring your drama stuff into my thread. It is going to take lots of work getting S back up and running smoothly. I'd like to see comments focused mostly on working to improve survival. Thanks Edited February 4, 2015 by unce 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchance Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 Stepping down. That's a new way of describing what happened. Why don't you own your share of the blame? I will not be sharing the reasons behind why they stepped down- That is between the head admins and the survival admins. They can do so themselves if they want it out in the public and I or another head admin will be happy to respond. I will not entertain any other questions on their reasons for stepping down from any other player. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobylane Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 Okay guys stop removing my shit. It is shit that S players have been lead on for the last 3 months with the idea that something new was in the works. Quitting after 3 months of work with nothing to show for it is ridiculous. Do the smart thing and promote players that actually play on the server and get involved in the community to run it. Look back at every successful S revision, the admins were actively involved in the community. Lets use this as a learning experience and fix the survival server. I look back at every revision and see that the players will play anything the admins provide, as the admins have sensible ideas. Involving the community in the planning stages doesn't have a great success rate, eg the Civcraft rev. I look at the admins leaving, and I don't assume that there's nothing to show for it. Even when a revision is launched the players don't know everything involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TornadoHorse Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 This seems a little rushed? We are down to 1 admin suddenly and get a paragraph telling us about the end of the rev? Any plans beyond that? Vanilla again or something new? This leaves more questions than answers but nonetheless appreciate the response Jchance. I don't think this is something that was properly planned on, otherwise I'm sure replacements would've been thought about. Either way, we now have that fresh start that we've been looking for to make a real difference with survival. To be totally honest, I don't think the admins stepping down right now really affects anything except maybe the rate at which adminreqs get done. We weren't really about to transition into a new revision or anything, so we now have this time to properly take control of survival and make it what we want it to be. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CROCKODUCK Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 I don't think this is something that was properly planned on, otherwise I'm sure replacements would've been thought about. Either way, we now have that fresh start that we've been looking for to make a real difference with survival. To be totally honest, I don't think the admins stepping down right now really affects anything except maybe the rate at which adminreqs get done. We weren't really about to transition into a new revision or anything, so we now have this time to properly take control of survival and make it what we want it to be. Okay, so first off. I find your lack of empathy a little disturbing. Sure the admin setup wasn't the most ideal to what all s players wanted, but the fact that they were willing to take on the position is more than I can give them credit for. I appreciate the work Mumber and Aca both put in between the time they were here. Believe it or not there are still people on the other side of the computer screen, and they still have input whether they helped out in the past or will in the future. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TornadoHorse Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 Okay, so first off. I find your lack of empathy a little disturbing. Sure the admin setup wasn't the most ideal to what all s players wanted, but the fact that they were willing to take on the position is more than I can give them credit for. I appreciate the work Mumber and Aca both put in between the time they were here. Believe it or not there are still people on the other side of the computer screen, and they still have input whether they helped out in the past or will in the future. I was talking only objectively about the state of the servers. I'd like to thank Mumberthrax for the work that he's done as both mod and admin and to Aca for her work as tech and mod, and it's a shame she wasn't able to be sadmin for any longer. I didn't mean to offend anyone with what I said if that's what I've done, but I'm trying to take positives away from what has happened here. It is an unfortunate situation to find ourselves in but I believe that we now have a fresh platform to work from. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CROCKODUCK Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 I was talking only objectively about the state of the servers. I'd like to thank Mumberthrax for the work that he's done as both mod and admin and to Aca for her work as tech and mod, and it's a shame she wasn't able to be sadmin for any longer. I didn't mean to offend anyone with what I said if that's what I've done, but I'm trying to take positives away from what has happened here. It is an unfortunate situation to find ourselves in but I believe that we now have a fresh platform to work from. Misunderstood what you were implying when you said "fresh start" apologies 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderMan Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 (edited) Misunderstood what you were implying when you said "fresh start" apologies Fresh set of eyes to refresh the OLDEST PVP SERVER in all of minecraft. To bring it back to what it once was. S was the premier pvp server (in all of minecraft) back in the day. Currently, the servers that take up that spot are HCF, Kohi, Badlion, and others. S is nowhere close. Edited February 6, 2015 by gsand 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobylane Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 Gsand that would be assuming the premier pvp server of today can be vanilla, or can be free to play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 Gsand that would be assuming the premier pvp server of today can be vanilla, or can be free to play. Wouldn't a less vanilla PvP server be better than an empty Vanilla one? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobylane Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 (edited) Wouldn't a less vanilla PvP server be better than an empty Vanilla one? Not my decision to make, but that is the ground rule we've had so far. Partly to fit in with P, C and E I would expect/hope that the head admins require S to be vanilla or close (ie Civcraft ok, Factions not, modded not). Until we hear otherwise. Four tells me they have said otherwise. Anyway, rev 28 isn't going to rock the boat, the first reply in this topic rightly suggests merely a 1.8 world. A timely rev 29 probably won't allow time for the new admins to plan something majestic. Edited February 6, 2015 by tobylane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Four_Down Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 Gsand that would be assuming the premier pvp server of today can be vanilla, or can be free to play. All of the servers gsand listed are "free to play", besides needing to buy a MineCraft account of course. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderMan Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 Stepping down. That's a new way of describing what happened. Why don't you own your share of the blame? That's the only way of describing it. It is a minecraft server, after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.