Jump to content

Trooprm32

Members
  • Posts

    681
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Trooprm32

  1. Consider this a warning. Please reply back here stating the rule you broke, and that you will abide with the Rules from now on.
  2. I've always thought it would be a cool idea as to why we change worlds (revs), in story form of course. For instance, the current P rev is a spaceship, why not have it "take us" to the next rev, and leave remnants of it around the future spawn? Just something I think would be neat :)
  3. Hey! Earlier today I caught you x-raying, and was kind of sad when I found out :(. Xraying is always against the rules, and your ban length will be set at one month. In the meantime, please read the Rules, and make a new appeal on October 9th saying that you read the rules, and you will follow them from then on.
  4. Alright, unbanning you, have fun :)
  5. Hey, you used a homophobic slur in chat earlier, so I banned you. Using that word, even when not name calling directly, is never okay. Reply back here tomorrow stating that you have read the Rules, and I'll unban you.
  6. Unbanning for the Kitcat, welcome back!
  7. It's hard to choose, but I might have to say The Two Towers is my favorite, a lot of great scenes in that one!
  8. As this came up in mumble, and is something I have been thing thinking about while playing on S, what is grief bait, and what isn't? I would like to see a list/compilation of block types which are considered as so, so it can be easier for players to identify grief bait whether placing or destroying, and for moderators; when attempting to fulfill modreq's pertaining to such grief. I have intentionally not started the list to see what other people think.
  9. Hey! You were banned from crop griefing, and continuing even after I warned you a couple days ago. Here's a couple of screens of what you did; As per my crude screenshots, you did not replant anything in that area. Please reply to this thread stating that you have read the rules and that you will abide by them, and I'll unban you! Thanks, Troop.
  10. Bonuses and perks for voting isn't a good idea.
  11. With this new command, there seems to be a bug with cats (and maybe dogs?). My cats are acting like I don't own them, and when I right click, they don't sit, and they also do not follow me. /Petowner claims they are mine, which they are. EDIT: Appeared to fix itself.
  12. I'm pretty sure its banned. That's why there's secret portals.
  13. Communal voting on bans is a bad idea, it would become, once again, a popularity contest.
  14. TBH; if it wasn't for portals, I would never leave my home city.
  15. I have also lost over 200 hours on my usage, and likely a bunch of days, and I'm also only at 6.60 hours per day from over 8.00 per day. This is on PvE
  16. To be fair, Seneca this rev didnt have a wide variety of core/regular players, most of the 200 were one time builders who left. It's the same thing with Pico.
  17. As a response to Diz regarding new moderators; I imagine there are many people out there who are capable of becoming a mod, but if they isolate themselves from other towns/communities, how are we supposed to know if they are capable? It goes back to the: "we won't make an unknown play a mod". The reason why more of the 'popular' or known players, for lack of better words, get chosen, is because they know the mods/ or are in communities with staff in it. I am betting there are a lot of capable people out there, who just don't show themselves. If mod nominations were to slide towards players, it would become nothing more than a popularity contest :\
  18. Random's idea is actually very interesting. The reason why the inner area is so packed is people want to be close to the portals. If we have portals out further after an expansion, it gives people more options to get around easily without being close to spawn.
  19. All Hail our lord and saviour
  20. Probably the reason why we don't get into this is; it is very resource intensive. Another thing is, I remember Thrawn saying that we don't have enough staff who are well versed in these TECH mod packs, to be able to control the server correctly. (paraphrased by memory)
  21. Sounds like a neat idea. For the people breaking in, will an item not drop like in C, so they can't abuse the rollback?
  22. Personally not something I would agree with, endermen block nabbing is pesky enough as is. I would find it hard to see this as a "difficulty" change, but rather an annoyance change. As an example; think of towns as big as Seneca, or Pico. They have a lot of members, and any one of them could drag, intentionally or not, a creeper, to blow up someones house. I can imagine it would be untracable, and you will have a LOT more modreq's on your hands. Edit: And now that I thought more about this... it could be an open invitation for griefers to grief unprotected builds in a free-edit zone (unprotected) and get away with it.
  23. Den, we need another Volcano next rev!
×
×
  • Create New...