Creative Revision 34 Feedback/Poll

[Hollifer]

Our new revision is approaching, and as always, we're ready to hear your thoughts about how to improve the map and server in whole during this time.
*Please note that this Poll/Feedback topic will be up much longer than usual, as Revision 34 will not be released until sometime in October.
(And as always, we will be announcing the official launch day exactly 1 month before launch)

Questions on the poll resemble those asked last year. If there's anything that you don't see on the poll, please feel free to open a discussion in the comments. We, the Cadmins, will try our best to keep up in replying and working with the player base of Creative to make a map that will satisfy.

A useful link to consider for discussion on events can be found here:

All discussion and feedback is very much appreciated, thank you for taking the time to read.


 

Edited July 24, 2018 by Hollifer

[TokenChineseGuy]

Theodore roar and grunt

[Haiku]

uwu~~

that aside,

I kinda like the decent sized islands i used to build my city on, although i would like larger islands and maybe a larger ocean area.

on spleef, i love the event, however i feel like the arena needs to be updated. A player contest could be done to create a new arena.

I like idea of groupbuild as it creates a closer bond within the community, as everyone usually can contribute something.

overall i think the C Team is doing great, keep it up, proud of you guys.

 

 

 

[Mewcifer]

1. All the crazy terrain is amazing!!! Bard makes the coolest maps, end of story.

2. More islands and more ocean please!! Thank youuu

3. I'm fine with pretty much everything here--it seems to make most of the player base happy, especially those who come straight from a classic plotme server. If we do another long revision, tho, we should look into building a lot more plots. We ran out quick, and even though we can remove the plots of inactive players, it might just be easier to have a lot.

4. Big maps: lots of space to go around for everyone!

5. The map was incredible in my opinion, so I have no further comments here.

6. Well, map size and length go hand in hand: if you have a lot of space, you should have a lot of time to fill said space.

7. I'm alright with Weekly Build, honestly. We should probably scrape together another forum for new topics.

8. I love Speedbuild... maybe that's cause I host it,,,, (apology unaccepted)

9. I personally don't care much for spleef. Its not my cup of tea. If others like it, feel free to keep it! I know lots other people like it, like Tim, who just asked me "what's wrong with you?" over voice call while we're all filling this out.

10. I don't think we need a new event in rotation, personally it seems like 2 weeks between each unique event is long enough. Keeping it flexible sounds great to me. 

11. I just like to build :D

12. Peachy!

13. 13 who?

14. It's fine to me, as long as it makes everyone happy.

15. I have a hard time kicking things off so a read only is fine with me. 

16. Cheers for Rev 34!

[DrTim58]

In terms of map stuff, I adored this revision but it needed more ocean. In support of this revision, it had a diverse set of biomes that I found to be fitting towards practically anything I'd build. In terms of rules I disagree with, it's simply the matter of the "REEEE" rule and I discussed it to death on the topic thread about it and will refrain from it here. When it comes down to weeklybuild, my complaints extend past the topics, I'll touch on that later. The topics themselves weren't something I was intrigued by tbh. I was hoping we'd have something more along the lines of "paranormal" or " spaceships." The most recent topic "Insomnia," I've found to be too broad and "Bigfoot" to be a bit too restricting. Outside of topics, the plots for the builds themselves have been small and inhibit what I can and cannot build. The one time I really felt drawn to weeklybuild, I ended up being unable to build something of a scale befitting of my build style. Though I do admit it's a good way to make people build outside of their comfort zones and I still saw some amazing builds despite the size. The topic in question was "Military" and that would warrant anything from small to large in terms of size. All in all though, I quite enjoy the idea of having weeklybuild and would love to see it return next revision with topics that can appeal to other individuals, such as myself. I can't speak for many others on their views on it, so do consider that what I have said are simply my personal views on the event.

12 minutes ago, Haiku said:

uwu~~

 

I concur

[nevastop]

i MIGHT be coming back to build a new arena this next rev. since they are getting actual use now, instead of just being for show, i want to know what you guys want in a new arena, and what you DON'T want in a new arena. let me know!

[Abitcat]

1. Keep the same way the map is now, 50/50 worldpaint/normal, its pretty spicy.
2. I like the flat areas and smooth mountains, because it gives people an area to build without it being wonky or have it mowed down with w/e.
3. Bring back Port please. just bring it back.
4. Make the map 10k/10k. Since not as many people are playing the server frequently anymore, the map we have currently is just filled with empty spaces. Look back at like rev 28, which was filled with shit, which in my opinion is good.
5. lol
6. Make it 175 days. This rev felt like it's dragging on and on annnd onnnnnn.
7. Weekly Build is fun, no needed things here.
8. Speedbuild has always been a fun event, and it always has been.
9. Ugh, here comes my negatives. In my opinion, I don't really like Spleef. To me, it doesn't really get anymore players than what we have now, in fact, Speedbuild is getting more players. What I would do is make it teams again, just like back in the early days of it.
10. Aw hell yeah, have Group Build as a officially hosted event.
12. The rules are fine as is.
13. There is no 13. 13 is a lie.
14. I think removing the 10-block buffer zone was a good idea.
15. Yes yes yes yes oh dear Lord yes.
16. yes

 

pretty spicy, i might add

Edited August 1, 2018 by Abitcat
nic

[Flame623]

18 hours ago, nevastop said:

i MIGHT be coming back to build a new arena this next rev. since they are getting actual use now, instead of just being for show, i want to know what you guys want in a new arena, and what you DON'T want in a new arena. let me know!

I will help you with that NEVAstahp

[tobylane]

I wouldn't choose another map this size, this only felt right because it might not have been reset. The world, rules and events are fine, it seems it works for the people who are there.

Don't like the open book policy but I see how it would benefit other, actually active, people. I don't see how it would benefit creativity, only production.

[MasterCommaThe]

Is there a chance we can put all of the old revisions in read-only mode? This was planned at one time with the "museum" and some of us old farts have a bit of nostalgia.

[fazaden]

My number 1 problem with FFA spleef is that some jerk can just delete the block right outside of the gate and screw over everyone else in that gate. It's not fun, it shouldn't be part of the game, it's an absolute dick move. If we do a new arena, wider gates are a must.

[Abitcat]

On 7/24/2018 at 1:37 AM, nevastop said:

i MIGHT be coming back to build a new arena this next rev. since they are getting actual use now, instead of just being for show, i want to know what you guys want in a new arena, and what you DON'T want in a new arena. let me know!

Make a really cool one

[MasterCommaThe]

Talk to me about the redstone for those gates. I have made several very reliable 4+ x 6+ gates in the past.