tobylane

https://nerd.nu/forums/topic/3024-new-logo-design-contest/?p=24519 This is the only image big enough for Teespring. If the background of that image is transparent and take away the border it would be minimalist. Could someone make large enough (200x200+) versions of the coloured glasses?

I can't remember where it came from, just that it was popular at the time. I see that either you weren't in agreement at the time or have changed your mind. What do you want? Everyone who leaves will be missed equally. No one group is more important than another - thats why we invited the civcraft people and thats why it was unfortunate we didn't want to continue the sort of server they wanted.

What tells you that it'll be better user experience? edit: Please can people provide some sort of uptime chart for any new hosters they suggest? OVH or some other name of theirs had downtime yesterday.

Aeyrix you could also say that mature people wouldn't discuss certain volatile topics in an open chatroom. If the mods ask for those topics to be moved to clanchats then we aren't missing anything in public that would be expected for mature people chatting. Are you a P player?

Beer before liquor never been bettor. Try every beer you can reach, then move onto liquors, cocktails, chasers and all the liquid joy and courage in the place.

Are the concerns you listed not enough?

How about you put a potential portal in every 1km^2 of the map then when a player claims it a mod rolls a dice in public (commandhelper?). D6 creates a portal. Maybe after two months let new towns roll the dice again where someone was unlucky first time around. That would create roughly 13 portals on the current world first time around, exactly what the rev actually started with. Another 6 later.

I reject the premise of your question. You know that it's not offensive to you. What do the mods know rather than what could the mods guess that is favourable to you? They are doing a good job in ensuring a variety of people are not offended. 4chan is for the hard headed, go there if you want that kind of freedom.

If you know the intent of a conversation then in hindsight you can make a much more accurate judgement of what is going on and what needs to be stopped. If you don't have either of those, like anyone but you at the time then it's fuzzy. I believe that last time this was covered the outcome was it's acceptable when mods 'overreact' in a fuzzy area.

There's something in the UK news about how charities chase up people who are known for donating money in the past. If we didn't want to rush a new fundraising event do we have the emails of a large portion of past donors? Could we email all of them, regardless of whether they still play here or any Minecraft?

That kind of freedom led to a level of variety some people couldn't deal with. They want uniformity in actions.

The current admins have considerable plans, and it seems that they get delayed by burnouts and bringing new people up to speed. Other than that setback, yes.

A very common request is for shorter revisions. I believe six weeks was a target.

There have been requests to go back to beta, to remove all or some of the things introduced since. I find that an overreaction, so I was suggesting a few things that would make things cheaper. Making things cheaper/quicker/easier seems to be a common theme in the successful changes - see enchantism.

Perceptions, which is slightly different to basis for trust. I said yes to that question because I know of a few bad actions but I still trust the mod team.

There's a lot of "It was better in the old days" people here in the forums. I'm not one of them, I just suggested something that allows people to battle a little cheaper. You are correct about health potions though, for the same two reasons they could be banned.

Ridiculous's sounds a lot like Junction's idea for a P/S mix. That also had good detail and support but didn't get anywhere. It is certainly the one to try as it has the broadest appeal.

What rules would the players be asked to use if they want the event to be endorsed? How strict do you intend to be with this? I've heard many people talk about having professional rented servers not going to their full use, if that's correct then we can have top quality hosts all over the world (assuming their ToS allows it).

I like this, and I'd include ignoring the reduction from feather falling. I dislike the bed and buyable xp changes. Could you explain the need for these? Spawn farm, bulletin board and buffer zone are very good. Could this include player made iron grinders? I haven't seen any arena activity ingame, what times are they normally at and how much more can this vary?

What roast said applies to Magynus and what Magynus said applies to roast. All bans are useless if you make an arbitrary assumption that they'll never reform. All bans are a waste of space if they, or trouble with common decency, take up space in your mind. All kicks are a waste of effort if they don't take notice. Lets not make such terrible broad assumptions. If we're wanting to think positively of new people then lets say that as the aim. Otherwise it seems you have a conclusion based on your desires not reasoning. I still like kittypuppet's idea, but only if we have a problem with too many bans, and griefing is a significant portion of them. I don't see the current occasional delays as such a problem.

I like that we don't do it that way. It sends a clearer message that is considerably less ignorable. It's not a hardcore-like tempban where you go away for an hour and come back to do the same thing again. You come to the forums and spell out your wrong-doing. If that would correct the behaviour then I'd agree with you, it just doesn't fit human nature.

He started to act out in ways that /r/wtf would not upvote due to their weirdness. edit: Someone said this would be funny. They were wrong.

It was a little too vanilla for him, and he decided to do something about that.